0

Cuatro Mueren en una Planta Química de DuPont

Fuga Química Mata a Cuatro en una Planta Cerca de Houston

Una válvula defectuosa es la culpable en las muertes de cuatro trabajadores en una planta de DuPont en La Porte, Texas, alrededor de las 4 a.m., el Sábado 15 de Noviembre. La Junta Federal de Seguridad Química ha enviado a investigadores a la planta. Fuentes dicen que la muerte incluyen trabajadores que estaban respondiendo a la fuga. Entre los muertos están dos hermanos, uno de los cuales murió tratando de rescatar al otro. Un quinto trabajador fue tratado por exposición, pero dado de alta del hospital.

El peligroso químico –metil mercaptano – es utilizado para darle el familiar olor a huevo podrido al gas natural, haciéndolo más fácil de detectar. Es también utilizado en funguicidas e insecticidas. Los oficiales de la industria dicen que, en dosis altas, puede llevar a vomitar, pérdida de conocimiento y muerte. Los residentes alrededor de la planta reportaron el olor a gas, pero también dijeron que había “olor raro” producido por la planta todo el tiempo. Los oficiales dijeron que el metil mercaptano estaba en toda el área como resultado de la fuga, pero dijeron que se disipó y no era amenaza para el público.

Esta no es la primera vez en memoria reciente que DuPont ha visto la muerte de un empleado en una de sus plantas químicas. La compañía fue citada en el 2011 por la Junta de Seguridad Química por permitir “una serie de deficiencias prevenibles” que resultaron en la muerte de un trabajador en su planta de Belle, West Virginia. Un año antes, la Junta de Seguridad Química determinó la muerte de un trabajador de DuPont en Buffalo, Nueva York, y fue atribuido a la falla de la compañía de monitorear los niveles de gas inflamable en un tanque de bodega que estaba para ser soldado.

Contáctenos

En el despacho jurídico de Bailey & Galyen, proporcionamos una consulta inicial gratuita a todos los clientes. Para programar una cita con un abogado con experiencia en derecho familiar de Texas, contáctenos por correo electrónico o llame a nuestras oficinas en una de nuestras ubicaciones convenientes enlistadas abajo. Tomaremos su llamada 24 horas al día, siete días a la semana.

0

Taking away right to sue when wrong has been done isn’t helping Texans

Op-Ed in the American Statesman
by Alex Winslow, Local Contributor and Executive Director of Texas Watch Texaswatch.org

While the state is crumbling under a real health care crisis, Gov. Rick Perry and his friends in the special interest lobby continue defending a lobbyist-driven health care battle from a decade ago that has failed Texas patients.

They want you to believe that taking away the legal rights of patients is good medicine. Try as they might, though, there is no disputing the facts:

Texas ranks dead last in the quality of health care, our health care costs are soaring at a rate faster than the national average, we rank near the bottom in the number of doctors who actually see patients, and we have the highest rate of people without health insurance. These are facts, not spin-doctored anecdotes like the ones the governor and his cronies in the insurance lobby like to use.

Back in 2003, politicians and lobbyists made a pack of promises about what they alleged would happen if voters approved a ballot proposition that severely and arbitrarily restricted the legal rights of Texas patients.
Among them was that what you spend on health care would go down. Turns out, they lied. Now, they are trying to cover their tracks.

Insurance industry lobbyist John Opelt recently said, “We did not and have not led voters astray.”

Really? Numerous political mailers paid for by Opelt’s group during the 2003 campaign tell a different story.

One mailer said the ballot initiative would “reduce … health costs.” Another said it would make “health care more affordable and available for all Texans.”

All of this comes from a playbook they’ve been using for decades: Claim there is a crisis of some sort, say that restricting individual legal rights is the solution, promise Texas families and small business owners the moon, and attack anyone who disagrees.

Texans are smart, though. We know when someone is pulling a fast one.

How can it be that eliminating accountability for polluters, careless nursing homes, insurance companies, Wall Street bankers and big drug makers is good for the public? The answer is that it can’t be.

Numerous academic studies by independent organizations and legal scholars prove that it is a fallacy to claim that taking away the legal rights of individuals will benefit the public at-large.

Whether we are talking about patients, policyholders or small business owners, we have seen time and again that when lobbyists succeed in stripping or curtailing individual legal rights, the public is harmed.

The only ones who benefit are a narrow group of special interests.

Yet every time one of these proposals comes to the Texas Legislature, the lobbyists claim this will be good for all Texas citizens.

Texans know better. We believe that accountability is good and necessary. This is a basic value we teach our children.

When a person or corporation causes needless harm, they should be held responsible for it. Plain and simple.

When wrongdoers succeed in getting away with the harm they cause, the rest of us are left to pick up the pieces and pay the tab.

Texas faces a host of real-world problems, including a broken health care system. It has been a decade since the governor signed away the rights of Texas patients under the false promise of better, cheaper, and more accessible care.

Sadly, rather than admitting he was wrong, Perry has chosen to be campaigner-in-chief and head lobbyist for the special interests.

Texans deserve real solutions from leaders who understand the importance of personal and corporate responsibility, and who want to find answers to our state’s problems that improve the lives of everyday Texans not just a narrow group of powerful interests.